Legal Opinion

Benavides v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board & Specialty Risk Services

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 18, 2014No. B251487APublished

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KITCHING, J.

INTRODUCTION

Leopoldo Benavides and his employer’s workers’ compensation insurance carrier agreed in a stipulated award that Benavides was injured in the course and scope of his employment leaving him 51 percent permanently disabled.

Following a timely petition to reopen, the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) found Benavides to be 72 percent permanently disabled, based on a report prepared by the agreed medical evaluator (AME) subsequent to entry of the stipulated award. The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (appeals board), on a two-to-one vote, rescinded the disability…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Garza v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Zemke v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. LeBoeuf v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Huston v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Sully-Miller Contracting Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API