Benavides v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board & Specialty Risk Services
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KITCHING, J.
INTRODUCTION
Leopoldo Benavides and his employer’s workers’ compensation insurance carrier agreed in a stipulated award that Benavides was injured in the course and scope of his employment leaving him 51 percent permanently disabled.
Following a timely petition to reopen, the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) found Benavides to be 72 percent permanently disabled, based on a report prepared by the agreed medical evaluator (AME) subsequent to entry of the stipulated award. The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (appeals board), on a two-to-one vote, rescinded the disability…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Garza v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Zemke v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- LeBoeuf v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Huston v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Sully-Miller Contracting Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.