Legal Opinion

Mixon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 20, 1977No. GG-11Published

1Per curiam

Appellant, convicted below of attempting to obtain a controlled substance by fraud, contends that the State failed in its proof against him. The record reveals that Appellant presented a prescription for the controlled drug Tuinal to a Jacksonville pharmacist that the pharmacist noticed irregularities in the prescription, and that while the pharmacist was studying the prescription, Appellant made a phone call and left the drugstore before the prescription had been filled. The pharmacist testified that because Tuinal was a classified narcotic, it could only be dispensed if signed by a doctor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McArthur v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  2. Rollins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API