Waterman v. Lipman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.
Waterman, Truebenbach, and Waterman, alleging themselves to be partners under the name of Waterman & Co., commenced an action against Lipman, Louderback, and Cushing, to recover amounts alleged to be due on certain promissory .notes. Lipman alone was served with summons, and on his failure to answer, judgment was entered against him. Some four, years thereafter the plaintiffs took proceedings under sections 989 to 994 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for the purpose of obtaining an order that Louderback be bound by the judgment- which had been entered against Lipman. Louderback denied the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Cooper v. BurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Vincent v. GraysonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Meller & Snyder v. R & T PROPERTIES, INC.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Hillco, Inc. v. SteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- RAWSON VS. DIST. CT. (CAIN)Nevada Supreme Court · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.