Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Saylors

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 16, 1887PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Wayne Circuit Court — Hon. Hell Stuart, J u.dge. Action on account of lumber and building material, and for the foreclosure of a mecbanic’s lien. Judgment was entered by tbe circuit court for plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.

*505l mbchutio’s ais'for twon" ueu'o'^oiie: prooL11 o£ *504-I. Appellant does not question the correct*505ness of the judgment on the money demand, but contends ^at ^e circuik court was not warranted by the evidence in establishing and foreclosing the mechanic’s lien. The evidence shows that defendant was engaged in erecting two buildings at the same time, for each of which he procured materials from plaintiff, and it is contended that it was not shown that the particular materials for which a recovery was had went into the building on which the lien was sought to be established. It must be admitted…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bowman Lumber Co. v. NewtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bohn Sash & Door Co. v. CaseNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Lehmer v. HortonNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Golden Belt Lumber Co. v. McLeanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Bartlett v. BilgerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  5. Sheldon v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API