Jewell v. Kroo
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.
Plaintiffs, two married couples who are adjoining landowners, sought an injunction and damages because defendants came onto the property of the plaintiffs Jewell and destroyed a rock and earthen dam which was used as a source of irrigation water for the plaintiffs Mitzkowski. Defendants cross complained, seeking to have a water easement for their benefit declared valid and to have plaintiffs enjoined from interfering with the completion of a concrete dam which defendants were building to replace the rock and earthen dam on the Jewells’ property. Only the plaintiffs Jewell appealed from a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fitzstephens v. WATSONOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Thompson v. UglowOregon Supreme Court · 1873
- Evans v. KormanOregon Supreme Court · 1972
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hansen v. DavisAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Tooker v. FeinsteinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Tipperman v. TsiatsosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Mortgage Mint Corp. v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Davis v. NYE DITCH USERS IMP. DIST.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.