Hutchinson v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Accusation of misdemeanor; from city court of Douglas — Judge Lankford. July 11, 1910.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
The defendant was found guilty of being intoxi-cated on a public highway, under the provisions of the act of 1905 (Acts 1905, p. 114). Two points are raised by the record.
1. Upon the trial there was oral testimony to the efEeet that the *685road leading from Nichols to Broxton, in Coffee county, was a public road. No objection was offered as to the competency of this testimony. In the motion for new trial, for the first time, it is insisted that the testimony offered upon the trial, to the effect that the road under investigation was a public road, was incompetent for that purpose. As we pointed…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
3Cited by19 opinions
- Morgan v. BellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Bull & Son v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. BlanchardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Turner v. HardySupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Bailey v. NewberryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.