Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 12, 1916No. 6127PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Craig County; Preston S. Davis, Judge. Action in ejectment by Emma Johnson (nee Bussey) against J. E. Johnson and others. A demurrer was sustained to plaintiff’s reply, from which ruling plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BURFORD, O.

This was an action in ejectment brought by Emma Johnson to recover certain real property in Craig county. The petition was in the usual form. The Deming Investment Company disclaimed. The defendant Patton answered that his co-defendant, J. E. Johnson, the husband of the plaintiff, had theretofore been appointed plaintiff’s guardian by the county court of Craig county; that after such appointment he had regularly sold and conveyed the land in controversy under order and confirmation of the county court to J. H. Frogge, who had in turn conveyed the land to the defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hathaway v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Baker v. CuretonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Scott v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tucker v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Carolina v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. King v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Parmenter v. RoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. RichardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API