Legal Opinion

Pitt v. Freed

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Kings county. Action by Charles B. Pitt and others against Samuel C. Freed to recover certain' goods sold by plaintiffs to defendant. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, entered upon the decision of a judge after a trial before him without a jury. The action was for the recovery of a quantity of butter sold and delivered by the plaintiffs to the defendant; and the amended complaint charges fraud against him, in contracting and incurring the liability. An order of arrest was obtained in the' action, which was vacated by the general term. ..Previous to the commencement of this action, the plaintiffs brought suit in Pennsylvania, where the defendant lived, and procured an attachment therein against…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baxter v. . DrakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Leach v. LindeNew York Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martin v. FreedNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Millbury v. HeitzbergNew York Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API