Culliton v. VanHoof
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtWebster, C. J.
Sharon VanHoof appeals a superior court order dismissing her appeal from a small claims court judgment for lack of jurisdiction. VanHoof argues that her right to appeal the small claims court judgment was established by the fact that the judgment against her exceeded $100. We agree.
Facts
In March 1991, Carolyn Culliton sued VanHoof in small claims court alleging that VanHoof, owner of the R&S Hay Company, sold her 12.72 tons of defective hay. VanHoof filed a counterclaim against Culliton for $2,000. Subsequently, VanHoof filed a second counterclaim for $615.18. The small claims court judge…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Valley v. HandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- City of Bellevue v. KravikCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Speer v. RoneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
3Cited by1 opinion
- Liera v. SenatoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994