Legal Opinion

Culliton v. VanHoof

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 30, 1993No. 30746-1-IPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWebster, C. J.

Sharon VanHoof appeals a superior court order dismissing her appeal from a small claims court judgment for lack of jurisdiction. VanHoof argues that her right to appeal the small claims court judgment was established by the fact that the judgment against her exceeded $100. We agree.

Facts

In March 1991, Carolyn Culliton sued VanHoof in small claims court alleging that VanHoof, owner of the R&S Hay Company, sold her 12.72 tons of defective hay. VanHoof filed a counterclaim against Culliton for $2,000. Subsequently, VanHoof filed a second counterclaim for $615.18. The small claims court judge…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Valley v. HandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  2. City of Bellevue v. KravikCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  3. Speer v. RoneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Liera v. SenatoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API