Legal Opinion

Henry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 3, 2017No. Case No. 5D17-92Published

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING-

2Per curiam

We grant Leighdon Henry’s Motion for Rehearing, withdraw our earlier per cu-riam affirmance and substitute the following in its place.

As to Counts 1, 2, 3 and 5, the sentencing documents shall, on remand, be amended to reflect that Henry is entitled to a review of his- sentence after serving twenty years, not twenty years after the date of his initial sentencing. See § 921.1402(2)(d), Fla. Stat. (2014); Tyson v. State, 199 So.3d 1087, 1089 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016).

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

PALMER, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jamie L. Tyson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016