Legal Opinion

North Country Agency, Inc. v. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 2006No. Docket 262472Published

1Opinion of the Court

Fer CURIAM.

In this breach of contract action, plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s grant of summary disposition in favor of defendant. We affirm.

We review de novo a lower court’s ruling on a motion for summary disposition. Maiden v Rozwood, 461 Mich 109, 118; 597 NW2d 817 (1999). A motion under MCR 2.116(C)(10) tests the factual sufficiency of the complaint. Id. at 120. In reviewing a decision on a motion for summary disposition based on the lack of a material factual dispute, we consider the affidavits, pleadings, depositions, admissions, and other documentary evidence submitted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Henderson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Bradley v. Philip Morris, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Stringwell v. Ann Arbor Public School DistrictMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Stringwell v. Ann Arbor Pub. School Dist.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API