Legal Opinion

Moon v. Maryland

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 8, 1970No. 267PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Per curiam

“When at the behest of the defendant a criminal conviction has been set aside and a new trial ordered, to what extent does the Constitution limit the imposition of a harsher sentence after conviction upon retrial?” This was the question the Court dealt with last Term in North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U. S. 711. We held in that case that there exists no absolute constitutional bar to the imposition of a harsher sentence upon retrial, but that due process “requires that vindictiveness against a defendant for having successfully attacked his first conviction must play no part in the sentence he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Moon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Chaffin v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Danforth v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Danforth v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Michigan v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API