Legal Opinion

John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 28, 1976No. C.D. 4652; Court No. 72-8-01766PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

This action involves the proper tariff classification of importations described on the special customs invoice as *164“Dynacraft Hose SAE J1402 Type D.” The hose was manufactured by the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company of Canada, Limited, at Collingwood, Ontario, Canada, and imported in September 1971 by the Dynacraft Company, a division of Paccar Inc., Bellevue, Washington, one of the plaintiffs herein. Plaintiff John V. Carr & Son, Inc. is a customs broker, agent and attorney in fact for the importer.

The imported merchandise was classified by the government under item 772.65 of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. General Instrument Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  3. General Instrument Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  4. General Instrument Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  5. Amplifone Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  2. Motor Wheel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
  3. Uniroyal, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API