Legal Opinion
Cotter v. Figaro
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 30, 1948No. 3011PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff in this suit is a duly licensed Real Estate Agent of Lafayette, La. He claims the sum of Fifteen Hundred ($1500.00) Dollars, less a credit of Two Hunderd Seventy Six and 78/100 ($276.78) Dollars as a commission for alleged services in procuring a purchaser for a lot of ground situated in Lafayette, listed with him by defendant, who represented himself as, and acted as, agent for the Estate of Achille Figaro. Plaintiff had become the owner of a 93/504th interest in the property by purchase from one of the Figaro heirs — Emma Figaro — October 20, 1944.
The listing in question was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mathews Bros. v. BerniusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Leaman v. RauschkolbLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
- Dauterive v. West India Transportation Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Clesi v. ThacherLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Palmisano v. E. J. Stewart, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Olympic Homes, Inc. v. OryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- Godchaux Sugars, Inc. v. OckmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
- Thibodeaux v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Treadaway v. AmundsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
- Cincinnati M & M Realty, Inc. v. UckotterOhio Supreme Court · 1968