Bandy v. FIRST STATE BANK, OVERTON, TEX.
Texas Supreme Court
1DissentGammage, Justice
I respectfully dissent. The court adopts a substantive rule favoring banks to the great detriment of decedents’ estates. Part IV of the court’s opinion states its “agreement with the majority rule,” but then adopts the minority rule that a bank *623may offset a deceased customer’s accounts against unmatured debts even though the decedent’s estate is solvent. The court reaches this conclusion out of concern for the bank’s ability to know whether the estate is insolvent, thereby apparently abandoning the rule that the burden of proof for insolvency is on the bank claiming the exception to justify…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Jordan v. . National Shoe and Leather BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Stockyards National Bank v. PresnallTexas Supreme Court · 1917
- Another v. Brookline Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Ainsworth v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Sullivan v. Merchants National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.