Legal Opinion
In Re Rochkind
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 6, 1991No. 19-42908PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO LIFT STAY
STEVEN W. RHODES, Bankruptcy Judge.
I
Norman C. Lippitt has filed a motion to lift the stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(1) and § 362(d)(2), for the purpose of pursuing foreclosure on a second mortgage he holds on the debtor’s residence. Mr. Lippitt contends that the debtor, Lynne Rochkind, and her husband, Sanford Rochkind, are in default on an obligation of approximately $100,000 owed to him.
Mrs. Rochkind opposes the motion, and contends that the note and mortgage on which Mr. Lippitt relies are not enforceable against her for two reasons. First, she contends that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hackley v. HeadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Rich & Whillock, Inc. v. Ashton Development, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Transcontinental Leasing, Inc., and Hussein Z. Keilani, Cross-Appellants v. Michigan National Bank of Detroit, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Stefanac v. Cranbrook Educational CommunityMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- Lafayette Dramatic Productions, Inc. v. FerentzMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re RochkindDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992