Harris & Hilton, P.A. v. Rassette
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge.
*281 This case presents the question of whether a categorical exception to the applicability of Rule 3.7 of the North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct exists in fee collection cases. Harris & Hilton, P.A. ("Harris & Hilton") appeals from the trial court's order disqualifying Nelson G. Harris ("Mr. Harris") and David N. Hilton ("Mr. Hilton") from appearing as trial counsel in this action based *156 on their status as necessary witnesses. Because this Court lacks the authority to create a new exception to Rule 3.7, we affirm the trial court's order.
Factual and Procedural Background
On…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- North Carolina Department of Transportation v. PageCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Lexis-Nexis v. Travishan Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Duval v. OM HOSPITALITY, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Heavner v. HeavnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Paradigm Consultants, Ltd. v. Builders Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Funderburk v. Cont'l Tire The Ams.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
- In Re Se. Eye Ctr. (Pending Matters)North Carolina Business Court · 2020
- Lemberg Law, LLC v. Egeneration Marketing, IncDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Pitt County Mem'l Hosp. v. PhilipsSuperior Court of Guam · 2019
- Reynolds v. BurksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.