Legal Opinion

Harris & Hilton, P.A. v. Rassette

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 2017No. COA16-809PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge.

*281 This case presents the question of whether a categorical exception to the applicability of Rule 3.7 of the North Carolina Rules of Professional Conduct exists in fee collection cases. Harris & Hilton, P.A. ("Harris & Hilton") appeals from the trial court's order disqualifying Nelson G. Harris ("Mr. Harris") and David N. Hilton ("Mr. Hilton") from appearing as trial counsel in this action based *156 on their status as necessary witnesses. Because this Court lacks the authority to create a new exception to Rule 3.7, we affirm the trial court's order.

Factual and Procedural Background

On…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. North Carolina Department of Transportation v. PageCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Lexis-Nexis v. Travishan Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Duval v. OM HOSPITALITY, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. Heavner v. HeavnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Paradigm Consultants, Ltd. v. Builders Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Funderburk v. Cont'l Tire The Ams.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
  2. In Re Se. Eye Ctr. (Pending Matters)North Carolina Business Court · 2020
  3. Lemberg Law, LLC v. Egeneration Marketing, IncDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
  4. Pitt County Mem'l Hosp. v. PhilipsSuperior Court of Guam · 2019
  5. Reynolds v. BurksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API