Legal Opinion

Carey & Associates v. Ernst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 9, 2006PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*262Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered on or about March 26, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants’ cross motion to the extent of dismissing the fourth cause of action against defendant Rudi Ernst, Jr., unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In December 1997, plaintiff law firm was retained by defendants Rudolf and Angelika Ernst (the Ernsts) to represent Rudolf in an extradition proceeding brought by the Swiss government. The matter was litigated in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anostario v. VicinanzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Martin Roofing, Inc. v. GoldsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Lowinger v. LowingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Gibbs v. HoldenNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Carey & Associates v. ErnstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nasso v. Bio Reference Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  2. Carducci v. BensimonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. DePetris & Bachrach, LLP v. SrourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Camhi v. Tedesco Realty, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. MSL Productions, Inc. v. IMR Group LLCNew York Supreme Court · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API