State v. Hutt
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
CARTER, Justice.
The defendant appeals from his conviction following bench trial of the offense of theft in the third degree in violation of Iowa Code section 714.1(4) (1981). He contends on appeal that (1) the State’s evidence was insufficient to prove a necessary element of the crime charged; (2) the trial court, acting as finder of fact, found that he had not possessed criminal intent, a finding which should have precluded the court from making a determination that defendant was guilty; and (3) Iowa Code section 714.1(4) is unconstitutionally vague in its definition of the phrase “to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eggman v. ScurrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- State v. LeFloreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- State v. SheffeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HensleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- State v. McVeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- State v. WindersCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1985
- State v. SelestanCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1994
- State v. OgleCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.