David Sullivan v. Zoe (Sullivan) Rockwood

[¶ 1] David Sullivan appeals from a post-judgment order, entered by the District Court (Portland, Moskowüz, J.), denying his motions to modify and enforce the parties’ divorce judgment. Sullivan contends that the court erred by denying his motions and by declining to allow him to call a rebuttal witness. Because we conclude that the court erred when it denied Sullivan’s motion to enforce, we vacate that portion of the judgment, but we affirm in all other respects.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] We view the following facts “in the light most favorable to the court’s judgment.” Young v. Young, 2015 ME 89, ¶…