Legal Opinion

Shaun Adrian Jackson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 27, 2017No. 14-16-00817-CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Kevin Jewell, Justice

A jury found Shaun Adrian Jackson guilty of evading arrest with a motor vehicle. See Tex. Penal Code § 38.04(b)(2)(A) (West 2016). On appeal, he acknowledges the State proved all elements of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt except, he contends, the State did not present legally sufficient evidence that he was the driver. We conclude the evidence of appellant’s identity as the driver is legally sufficient and affirm the judgment.

Factual Background

The following facts are based on the guilt/innocence . phase trial evidence, viewed in the light most…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  4. Clayton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  5. Mosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Aidan Vitela v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2021
  2. Aidan Vitela v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2022
  3. Aidan Vitela v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2021
  4. Fahad Mohammad Khan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019
  5. Howard Hamilton Dotson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2021

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API