United States v. Joshua Barrow
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
At the time appellant Joshua Barrow pleaded guilty to a drug offense, the district court advised him that he faced a twenty-year minimum sentence, in accordance with the statutory minimum then in effect. By the time Barrow was sentenced, the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (“FSA”) had lowered the mandatory minimum for Barrow’s crime, which now required a ten-year minimum sentence. Barrow was sentenced to ten years as per the revised statute. Barrow seeks resen-tencing on the grounds that his plea was not knowing and voluntary because it was made pursuant to misinformation that a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Dorsey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020