Legal Opinion

Smith v. Barfield

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 1, 1985No. 853DC102PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this action seeking to recover damages from defendants growing out of a contract between plaintiffs and defendants for defendants to move a house owned by plaintiffs. In their verified complaint, plaintiffs alleged that they agreed to pay defendants the sum of $10,700.00 to move the house, one-half to be paid when the house was loaded for moving and the other half later. Plaintiffs paid defendants the sum of $5,350.00, but defendants failed to move the house as agreed upon. Plaintiffs also alleged that because defendants had failed to move the house as agreed…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grant v. CoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Williams v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Pangelinan v. PangelinanSupreme Court of The Commonwealth of The Northern Mariana Islands · 2025
  4. Unifund CCR Partners v. LogginsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  5. Unifund CCR Partners v. LogginsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API