A. C. Denahan & Co. v. Holmesburg Granite Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 518, Oct. T., 1910, by defendant, from order of C. P. Phila, Go., March T., 1910, No. 3,219, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of A. C. Denahan & Company, Incorporated, v. Holmesburg Granite Company. Assumpsit for work done. Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. Error assigned was order making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hendekson, J.,
The plaintiff’s cause of action arose out of a contract made between it and the defendant for the erection of stonework on the building of a water company which was erecting a pumping station in Bucks county. The whole work had been let to a contractor for whom the defendant had undertaken to furnish and erect all the cut stone required for the building. The plaintiff had also agreed to work and furnish materials in connection with another part of the same building. The plaintiff entered into an agreement with the defendant to set up window and door sills, copings and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Filbert v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Pepper v. City of Philadelphia ex rel. HorterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Holmes v. Chartiers Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Gallagher v. SharplessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
- Snedaker v. TorpeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
3Cited by1 opinion
- McKallip v. AltoonaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919