Legal Opinion

Ekonomides v. Sharaka

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 5, 2014No. 2D13-272PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SILBERMAN, Judge.

In an action for malicious prosecution brought by Jeanne Abou Sharaka (the Tenant), Nickolas Ekonomides appeals a final order denying entitlement to attorney’s fees on the basis that paragraph four of his proposal for settlement is ambiguous. We conclude that the subject paragraph is not ambiguous and reverse. We have also reversed the final summary judgment that was entered in Ekonomides’ favor in Abou Sharaka v. E & A, Inc., 135 So.3d 428 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). Thus, the issue of whether Ekonomides is entitled to recover fees must await resolution of the malicious prosecution…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  2. Anhloan Tran v. Anvil Iron Works, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Mady v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 2011
  4. Mix v. ADVENTIST HEALTH SYSTEM/SUNBELT, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  5. Sharaka v. E & A, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Town of Jupiter v. Sally ArmesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API