Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Arajakis v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1992No. 21725Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Rose, J., with whom Springer, V. C. J., joins,

concurring in part and dissenting in part:

I concur with the majority in upholding the jury verdicts returned against Arajakis but believe that because his request for the assistance of counsel, at the sentencing hearing was not honored, the sentences should be vacated and a new sentencing hearing held.

A defendant has a right to terminate his self-representation and request the assistance of counsel at any critical stage in a criminal proceeding, and a sentencing hearing is such a critical stage. Beals v. State, 106 Nev. 729, 802 P.2d 2 (1990).

At…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lyons v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Beals v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API