Legal Opinion

People v. Pace

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 19, 2008No. 4—08—0026, 4—08—0260 consPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knecht

In April 2007, counsel for defendant, Samuel Pace, moved for the voluntary dismissal without prejudice of a pro se petition filed pursuant to the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (Act) (725 ILCS 5/122 — 1 through 122 — 8 (West 1998)). Approximately nine months later, defendant sought reinstatement of his entire petition. In March 2008, the trial court concluded defendant was not entitled to reinstatement and refused defendant’s request. Defendant appeals, arguing he had an absolute right to reinstate his postconviction petition. We need not explore whether a right to reinstate was absolute,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. GreerIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  5. People v. VanceIllinois Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. MaloneAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  2. People v. HuffIllinois Supreme Court · 2024
  3. People v. CoeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  4. People v. MaloneAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  5. People v. PerryAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API