Legal Opinion

Grushkin v. Freudman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 1996No. Appeal No. 2Published

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages, including punitive damages, for alleged misrepresentations or concealments by defendants that induced her to invest in a real estate venture. Plaintiff moved for summary judgment, contending that she was induced to invest based upon six specified misrepresentations or concealments. Supreme Court properly determined that factual issues exist with respect to liability on the first, *1108fourth, fifth and sixth alleged misrepresentations. The court erred, however, in awarding summary judgment to plaintiff based upon the remaining alleged…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Webar, Inc. v. CapraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Rogers v. HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Weaver v. ReynoldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API