Jefferson County Drainage Board v. Baneck
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The drainage law as enacted in chs. 88 and 89, Stats., does not allow the creation of a drainage district piecemeal or by gerrymander. If, after an examination of the lands described in the petition and all other lands that the board believes will be benefited, the project is first organized by creating a district embracing only a portion of a natural watershed, then any later proceedings which seek to add lands directly affected and of the nature of the lands included in the first organization are without sanction of law.
Sec. 89.52, Stats., provides as follows:
“(1) Whenever any lands or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lower Baraboo River Drainage District v. SchirmerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- In re Catfish River Drainage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Jensen v. County BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Guenther v. RutkowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- In re Rocky Run Drainage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Town of Brookfield v. BeisberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Fremont Sheep Co. v. Big Bend Drainage DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
- In re Albemarle Drainage District, Beaufort County No. 5Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Jefferson County Drainage Board v. BaneckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953