Legal Opinion

Bond v. Reliance Insurance

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided June 3, 1959No. Civ. No. 8307-MPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIEB, District Judge.

This Suit, to recover the proceeds of a hull policy, was tried to the Court without a jury. It is a companion suit to W. F. Hempstead and A. F. Hempstead, d/b/a Dunn’s Boat Yard v. Yacht Escapade ex Thor II etc., No. 1485-N-Adm. The Court, having heard the testimony and having considered the briefs of counsel, now makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Findings of Fact.

1. Howard Bond, plaintiff, is a citizen and resident of the State of Florida, engaged in the business of buying and selling yachts.

2. The defendant, Reliance Insurance Company, formerly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Henjes v. Aetna Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  3. Tinsley v. Ætna InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Doerr v. National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  5. Bankers Life & Loan Ass'n of Dallas v. AshfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reliance Insurance Company v. The Yacht Escapade Ex the Thor II Etc., Reliance Insurance Company v. Howard BondCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  2. Hempstead v. The Yacht Escapade ex The Thor IIDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1959
  3. Reliance Insurance Company v. The Yacht Escapade Ex the Thor II Etc., Reliance Insurance Company v. Howard BondCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API