Legal Opinion
CERNER CORPORATION v. Visicu, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided October 26, 2009No. Case 04-1033-CV-W-GAFPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GARY A. FENNER, District Judge.
Now pending before the Court are six separate Motions for Summary Judgment concerning various issues present in this patent infringement case. 1 (Doc. ## 230, 232, 237, 241, 244, 269). After extensive briefing by the parties and careful consideration by the Court, Plaintifi/CounterDe-fendant Cerner Corporation’s (“Cerner”) Motion regarding non-infringement (Doc. #269) is DENIED; Cerner’s Motion regarding invalidity (Doc. #244) is DENIED; Cerner’s Motion regarding intervening rights (Doc. # 237) is GRANTED; Cerner’s Motion regarding willful infringement…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Powercorp Alaska, LLC v. Alaska Energy AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Secure Energy, Inc. v. Coal Synthetics, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2010
- Sarkissian Mason, Inc. v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Custom Hardware Engineering & Consulting, Inc. v. DowellDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2013
- Control Technology & Solutions, LLC v. Omni Energy Partners, LLC, et al.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2026