Legal Opinion

Dang v. Pontier

District Court, S.D. California

Decided December 15, 2020No. 3:19-cv-01519Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH DANG d/b/a LAW OFFICE OF Case No.: 19CV1519-GPC(AHG) JOSEPH DANG, an individual, 12 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff, 13 MOTION FOR INTERPLEADER v. DISCHARGE AND INTERPLEADER 14 DISBURSEMENT DAVID PONTIER, an individual; 15 TEOCO Corporation Group Benefit Plan, [Dkt. No. 110.] 16 a self-funded group health plan; TEOCO Corporation, a Delaware Corporation; 17 UMR Inc., a Delaware Corporation; Glenn 18 C. Nusbaum, an individual; Paul E. Kim, MD Inc., A California corporation; Kevin 19 Yoo, an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Susan Cripps, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant v. Life Insurance Company of North America, Plaintiff-Cross-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Gail Michelman v. Lincoln National Life InsurancCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. MacK v. KuckenmeisterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. In Re Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  5. Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co. v. RidgwayDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API