Legal Opinion

DEPT. OF AGR. & CONSUMER SERV. v. Polk

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 27, 1990No. 73842PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

568 So.2d 35 (1990)

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, Appellants/Cross-Appellees,

v.

Richard O. POLK, etc., Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

No. 73842.

Supreme Court of Florida.

September 27, 1990.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Beverly S. McLear, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Parker Thomson of Thomson, Muraro, Bohrer and Razook, P.A., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, and Mallory Horne, Gen. Counsel, Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Tallahassee, for appellants/cross-appellees.

J. Davis Connor of Peterson, Myers, Craig, Crews, Brandon & Mann, P.A., Lake Wales, and Douglas A.…

Also in this document: Concurrence · McDONALD; Concurrence · Barkett; Concurrence · Grimes; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tampa-Hillsborough County v. AGWSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Patchen v. FLORIDA DEPT. OF AGRICULTURESupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  3. 569 NW 54th Street, LLC v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
  4. Balis v. MartinDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
  5. Teitelbaum v. South Fl Water ManagementDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API