Pelton v. Com., Dept. of Public Welfare
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentLarsen, Justice
I dissent.
Not only do I find appellant Department of Public Welfare’s (DPW) deliberate choice to ignore the rulings of Commonwealth Court to be contemptible, that choice is morally reprehensible as well. There will never be a way to *338determine exactly how many good citizens of this Commonwealth were unable to regain the dignity of a useful and productive life during the economic crisis of this decade because of appellant’s begrudging and distorted interpretation of the special needs regulation. In this regard, I adopt the decision in this case of Judge MacPhail as my own. Pelton v.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pelton v. Commonwealth, Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985