Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Plestcheeff

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 18, 1938No. 8726, 8727Published

1DissentHealy, Circuit Judge

The construction given by the Board of Tax Appeals to § 11265 of the Washington code was based on the assumed authority of State v. Snohomish County, 71 Wash. 320, 128 P. 667. However, the state court there held only that real property in private ownership on March 1, but in public ownership when the taxes for the year are levied, cannot be subjected to the payment of taxes for that year. The Snohomish County Case is not properly to be taken as authority for the view that the Hen of a tax, under the state law, becomes effective only upon the making of a levy.

It is clear, as the majority…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. G. S. Nicholas & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. State v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. American Creameries Co. v. Armour & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Provident Savings Life Assurance Co. v. DeesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  5. Merchants Bank Bldg. Co. v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API