Veriscope Co. v. Brady
City of New York Municipal Court
Action by the Veriscope Company against William A. Brady. Judgment sustaining a demurrer to the answer. Harold Nathan, for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtO’Dwyer, J.
This is an action on two promissory notes, on each of which the defendant is an accommodation indorser. By his amended answer he interposed the same seven separate defenses to each note, and to the fourth, fifth, and .sixth defenses to the first note and their duplicates in the case of the second note plaintiff demurs on the ground that they are insufficient in law upon the face thereof. In the fourth defense the defendant alleges, in substance, that the plaintiff on or about July 27, 1898, entered into two agreements with Cooke and Welty, by which they leased from the plaintiff a certain…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gillespie v. . TorranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Crater v. . BiningerNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Townsend and Others v. GoeweyNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Lasher v. . WilliamsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- First National Bank v. WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- William Segar, Inc. v. 1967-1975 Ocean Avenue Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1926