Legal Opinion
Gethins v. Breeyear
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 20, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
This action is to recover on two checks signed by the defendant as maker and drawn on the Back Bay National Bank, one for $25 dated March 28,1922, payable to the order of “Cash,” and one for the sum of $75 dated April 3, 1922, payable to the plaintiff. The defendant’s contention is that there was no evidence of presentment. The judge found that the checks were presented at the bank. Both bore the notation, “Protested Non payment G. K. Gashell Notary Public May 24, 1922.” No seal of the notary public was attached to the notation, but no objection was made to the notation, and the certificate…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Damon v. CarrolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Mears v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Walker Ice Co. v. American Steel & Wire Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Usher v. A. S. Tucker Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Black v. BachelderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- DuBois v. PowdrellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Ryan v. DiPaoloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Mellet v. SwanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Bettencourt v. BettencourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Holyoke Water Power Co. v. American Writing Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.