Hunt v. State

FOSTER, Justice.

Appellant was tried and convicted of murder in the first degree, and his punishment fixed at death. His pleas were not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity.

There was no conflict as to the conduct of appellant, and no contention that he did not kill the person charged, his estranged wife, without justification. He seriously sought to sustain his plea of not guilty by reason of insanity, and offered much .evidence to that effect.

In rebuttal the State' offered witnesses, •some of whom were non-expert and some qualified as expert.

A. C. Anderson was a non-expert who for a…