Legal Opinion

Department of Revenue v. LaFratta

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 27, 1990PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

We are asked to explicate the relationship among a statute now repealed (G. L. c. 273, § 12), the current statute dealing with paternity adjudications (G. L. c. 209C, § 22 [ti?]), and art. 30 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights. Specifically, at issue is whether the District Court properly dismissed the Department of Revenue’s (department’s) paternity and support action under G. L. c. 209C, because of an earlier “dismissal with prejudice” of a paternity claim against the defendant under the now repealed statute, G. L. c. 273. We hold that there was no error and accordingly affirm the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boyd v. Jamaica Plain Co-Operative BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  2. Department of Revenue v. JarvenpaaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jarosz v. PalmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Alston v. Town of Brookline, MACourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  3. Department of Revenue v. Ryan R.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  4. Tuite & Sons, Inc. v. Shawmut Bank, N.A.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  5. A.B. v. C.D.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API