Legal Opinion
Ruhm v. C. P. Craska, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 4, 1977No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment modified, in accordance with memorandum and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. All concur, Goldman, J. not participating. Memorandum: By the judgments appealed from in the two actions herein jointly tried, defendants were restrained and enjoined from making any other than residential use of their property on Cosby Manor Road in the Town of Deerfield, Oneida County, it being adjudged that such *1017property is zoned residential and that there is no valid nonconforming use on any of it. The issues presented concern the validity of a zoning ordinance enacted by the Town of Deerfield in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- MATTER OF HARBISON v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- People v. PerkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
3Cited by5 opinions
- Syracuse Aggregate Corp. v. WeiseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Franklin County v. City of St. AlbansSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Tartan Oil Corp. v. Board of Zoning AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Town of Cortlandt v. SantucciNew York Supreme Court · 1994
- Town of Deerfield v. C. P. Craska, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977