Legal Opinion

Brady v. Brennan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 22, 1878PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Stearns county, MoKelvy, J., presiding, refusing a new trial, after verdict for defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtGtleillan, C. J.

Action on a promissory note. Defendants pleaded, as a counterclaim, that “the said plaintiff had and received of these, defendants four steers, each of the age of three years, and there and then of the j ust and full value of $120, which said sum the plaintiff was owing to these defendants at and before the commencement of this action.” This counterclaim is badly pleaded, for it does not show a sale of the steers, nor how they were had and received by plaintiff. No exception, however, was taken to it, and the *211defendants introduced evidence that plaintiff had, without their consent, taken the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burnap v. PartridgeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1830
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Terry Trading Corp. v. BarskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Story & Isham Commercial Co. v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Braithwaite v. AkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Downs v. FinneganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Norris v. CohenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API