Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Scott

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1828PublishedCited by 5 opinions

THIS was a proceeding by attachment, by Scott against Boggs.

1Opinion of the Court

M’Giuk, C. J,,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Anderson was summoned as garnishee; he failed to appear and answer, and judgment was entered against him; to reverse which, the cause is brought here. The *16matter assigned for error is, that the attachment was not so served that the garnishee was bound to appear. I am of opinion that this error is well assigned. The act says that the. manner of attaching the lands, tenements, goods, chattels, moneys, credits and effects of the defendant, shall he by the officer’s going to the place where, or to the person in whose hands or possession the same…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tuells v. TorrasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Howell v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. State ex rel. Senter v. CowellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Newton v. StrangMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Howell v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API