Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Kamilewicz
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided July 18, 1997No. 1960890PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dexter J. Kamilewicz, Gretchen L. Kamilewicz, and Martha E. Preston petition for a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to dismiss claims against them alleging malicious prosecution, breach of contract, and abuse of process. We grant the writ.
Daniel Edelman and his law firm, Edelman Combs ("Edelman"), filed an action in the Mobile Circuit Court against the law firm of Wildman, Harrold, Allen Dixon ("Wildman"); each of the partners in Wildman, individually; the law firm of Schnader, Harrison, Segal Lewis ("Schnader"); each of the partners in Schnader, individually; the Kamilewiczes; and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Elliott v. Van KleefSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Ex Parte Full Circle Distribution, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Ex Parte Dill, Dill, Carr, Stonbraker & Hutchings, PCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Ex Parte Phase III Const., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- 27001 Partnership v. Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.