Legal Opinion

Morier v. Moran

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 4, 1895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Assumpsit.—Breach of contract. Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. John Barton Payne, Judge, presiding. Submitted at the March term, 1895.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary

Edmond Morier and Arthur W. Underhill were sued by Charles Moran for . not taking coal under a contract with him. Underhill was not served with process.^ On the trial but two exceptions were taken, and those related only to matters not alluded to in the brief for the plaintiff in error, and therefore not to be considered. City of Mt. Carmel v. Howell, 137 Ill. 91.

Ho objection to the declaration was made below, nor does any assignment of error here question its sufficiency. Ho variance between the declaration and evidence was pointed out below, and therefore no question of variance can be…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Genet v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Schneider v. TurnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. McNulta v. EnschIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Memory v. NiepertIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Consolidated Coal Co. v. WombacherIllinois Supreme Court · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Interstate Construction Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Manningt v. Galland-Henning Pneumatic Malting Drum ManufacturingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Quigley v. Spencer Stone Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1906
  4. Chicago Edison Co. v. Huyett & Smith Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  5. William W. Brauer Steamship Co. v. Plano Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API