Miller v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Steffen, J.:
This appeal presents the question of whether defense counsel may cross-examine, for impeachment purposes, an alleged sexual assault victim concerning prior fabricated rape accusations. We conclude that under certain conditions, such a practice is permissible. However, for reasons discussed below and under the facts *499of this case, we conclude that it is not appropriate to reverse and remand to the trial court to give Miller an opportunity to cross-examine the complaining witness in such a fashion. Accordingly, we affirm.
On December 7, 1987, the complaining…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BohannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- John Michael Hughes v. Robert RainesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Clinebell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- Covington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- Little v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Hammer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Nevada v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- State v. BoggsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. WyrickCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- State v. SwindleNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.