Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1989No. 19166PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Steffen, J.:

This appeal presents the question of whether defense counsel may cross-examine, for impeachment purposes, an alleged sexual assault victim concerning prior fabricated rape accusations. We conclude that under certain conditions, such a practice is permissible. However, for reasons discussed below and under the facts *499of this case, we conclude that it is not appropriate to reverse and remand to the trial court to give Miller an opportunity to cross-examine the complaining witness in such a fashion. Accordingly, we affirm.

On December 7, 1987, the complaining…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BohannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. John Michael Hughes v. Robert RainesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Clinebell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  4. Covington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  5. Little v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Hammer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. Nevada v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. State v. BoggsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. WyrickCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  5. State v. SwindleNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API