Maloy Et Ux. v. Wm. Cameron Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Greer County; /. R. Tolbert, Judge. Action by Wm. Cameron & Company against H. M. Maloy and wife. From the judgment, defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The trial court, without the intervention of a jury, found that plaintiff (defendant in error) “has a valid, subsisting and unsatisfied lien, by virtue of said mortgage, upon the aforesaid real estate, which he is entitled to foreclose, as to all the right, title and interest of defendant therein, but subject to the aforesaid homestead rights of the said intervener (the wife), so that the purchaser at the foreclosure sale of the same shall take the legal title and all the reversionary rights of the defendant in and to the same, but so long as the same shall remain such homestead, the lawful…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McGuire v. Van PeltSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Moran v. ClarkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
- Pribble v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877
- Brame v. CraigCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876
- Drake v. RootSupreme Court of Colorado · 1875
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Whelan v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Jenkins v. HuntsingerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
- Standard Savings Loan Association v. ActonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Tiger v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Gerlach Bank v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.