Legal Opinion
Broadview Chemical Corporation v. Loctite Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 21, 1969No. 219, 220, Dockets 32722, 32723PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANKEL, District Judge:
In June of 1964 Broadview Chemical Corporation, the plaintiff-appellant, brought the action from which this appeal arises seeking a declaration of invalidity and non-infringement with respect to several patents held by Loctite Corporation, the defendant-appellee. Following counterclaims charging infringement and a course of discovery proceedings, the parties, on February 3, 1967, made a settlement agreement which provided for, and incorporated, the consent decree Broadview has now been found to have violated. Some limited aspects of the patents and of the steps…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Lane v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Bewal, Inc., a Corporation of Kansas and Benjamine C. Edwards, Jr. v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Applied Genetics International, Inc. v. First Affiliated Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Broadview Chemical Corporation v. Loctite CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Zenith Laboratories, Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Broadview Chemical Corporation v. Loctite CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Broadview Chemical Corporation v. Loctite CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.