Regal Cinemas, Inc. v. W & M Properties
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
Defendants W & M Properties, Developers Diversified, and John R. McGill (collectively, defendants) appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for judgment as a matter of law at the close of a jury trial. Defendants argue that they were entitled to judgment as a matter of law because plaintiff Regal Cinemas, Inc. failed to establish two elements of fraud under Ohio law: justifiable reliance and resulting damages. Further, defendants argue that the issue of punitive damages should not have been submitted to the jury. Regal Cinemas, Inc. cross-appeals the.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Baron T. Youn Kyong Hwan Choi, D/B/A Ckh Sportsworld, Ltd. v. Track, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Textron Financial Corp. v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Charles R. Combs Trucking, Inc. v. International Harvester Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- Robert G. Jackson, Robert P. Gettys, Attorney-Appellant v. The Law Firm of O'hara, Ruberg, Osborne and TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Alphonso Singleton v. Lee Edward Smith and Eric RossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Yellowbook Inc. v. Steven BrandeberryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Gresh v. Waste Services of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2010
- In Re LittleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
- Phillips v. Philip Morris Companies Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
- Navistar, Inc. v. Dutchmaid Logistics, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.