Legal Opinion

Regal Cinemas, Inc. v. W & M Properties

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 27, 2004No. Nos. 02-3450, 02-3514PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLE, Circuit Judge.

Defendants W & M Properties, Developers Diversified, and John R. McGill (collectively, defendants) appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for judgment as a matter of law at the close of a jury trial. Defendants argue that they were entitled to judgment as a matter of law because plaintiff Regal Cinemas, Inc. failed to establish two elements of fraud under Ohio law: justifiable reliance and resulting damages. Further, defendants argue that the issue of punitive damages should not have been submitted to the jury. Regal Cinemas, Inc. cross-appeals the.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Baron T. Youn Kyong Hwan Choi, D/B/A Ckh Sportsworld, Ltd. v. Track, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Textron Financial Corp. v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Charles R. Combs Trucking, Inc. v. International Harvester Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Robert G. Jackson, Robert P. Gettys, Attorney-Appellant v. The Law Firm of O'hara, Ruberg, Osborne and TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. Alphonso Singleton v. Lee Edward Smith and Eric RossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Yellowbook Inc. v. Steven BrandeberryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. Gresh v. Waste Services of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2010
  3. In Re LittleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
  4. Phillips v. Philip Morris Companies Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
  5. Navistar, Inc. v. Dutchmaid Logistics, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API