Legal Opinion

National Surety Co. v. Breuchaud

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 10, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Jules Breuchaud, from a judg. ment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 19th day of May, 1915, upon the verdict of a jury for $2,177.39, .rendered by direction of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Page, J.:

The plaintiff’s assignor, The Empire State Surety Company, entered into an agreement with the defendant to become his bondsman upon certain contracts with the city of New York. It was provided in the said agreement that the indemnitor “ will at all times indemnify and save the surety harmless from and against every claim, demand, liability, cost, charge, *796expense, suit, order, judgment and adjudication whatsoever, and will place the surety in funds to meet every claim, demand, liability, cost, charge, expense, suit, order, judgment or adjudication against it by reason of such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. National Surety Co. v. BreuchaudAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FalkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Stiers Management Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API