Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 12, 1964No. 4591PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant, Thomas James Armstrong, appeals from a summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief filed under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix.

t

The sole question is whether the allegations in the defendant's handwritten motion were sufficient to sustain relief under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, the petitioner having stated the following:

“Based on Criminal Procedure Rule # 1, Jan. Term, A.D., 1963, Supreme Court of Florida, I hereby apply for relief by vacation of the sentence imposed by the court on March 13, 1961. This application is based on the fact that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dykes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  2. Dias v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. Ashley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  4. Caminita v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  5. Turner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Leeds v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  2. State v. PiehlSupreme Court of Florida · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API