Armstrong v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The appellant, Thomas James Armstrong, appeals from a summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief filed under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix.
t
The sole question is whether the allegations in the defendant's handwritten motion were sufficient to sustain relief under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, the petitioner having stated the following:
“Based on Criminal Procedure Rule # 1, Jan. Term, A.D., 1963, Supreme Court of Florida, I hereby apply for relief by vacation of the sentence imposed by the court on March 13, 1961. This application is based on the fact that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dykes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Dias v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Ashley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Caminita v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Turner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Leeds v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- State v. PiehlSupreme Court of Florida · 1966